Attention A T users. To access the menus on this page please perform the following steps. 1. Please switch auto forms mode to off. 2. Hit enter to expand a main menu option (Health, Benefits, etc). 3. To enter and activate the submenu links, hit the down arrow. You will now be able to tab or arrow up or down through the submenu options to access/activate the submenu links.

PTSD: National Center for PTSD

Menu
Menu

Quick Links

Veterans Crisis Line Badge
My healthevet badge
EBenefits Badge
 

The Impact of Disaster and Mass Violence Events on Mental Health

Share this page

The Impact of Disaster and Mass Violence Events on Mental Health

In the aftermath disaster and mass violence, almost everyone who experienced the event will have stress reactions. For most people, these reactions will gradually decrease over time, but some survivors and responders—especially those with specific risk factors—may experience longer-term or severe responses.

Common Reactions

Those affected by disaster and mass violence exhibit a wide variety of psychological, behavioral, physical, and emotional reactions. The most common mental health diagnoses reported in research samples are posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, acute stress disorder, and complicated grief. Negative affect, perceived stress, physical health problems/somatic concerns, and poor sleep quality are also reported in disaster research (1-8). These reactions may be relatively common in the 6-12-month period after a disaster (9), and have been shown across a range of events.

Scale of Mental Health Reactions

The impact of disasters and mass violence on the mental health of survivors can vary. The proportion of survivors who develop chronic long-term problems is generally less than 10%, and rarely exceeds 30% (6-8). Two comprehensive reviews of disaster research document the magnitude of effects for 225 samples of survivors of 132 distinct events (4,5). Moderate effects—increased or prolonged stress, but little enduring psychopathology—were present in 50% of the samples. For 24% and 17% of the samples, respectively, the effects were severe or very severe. Severe effects were defined as a high (25% to 49%) prevalence of clinically-significant distress, while prevalence of clinically-significant distress of 50% or higher was indicative of very severe post-event effects.

Time Frame for Reactions

Research shows that a significant proportion of those exposed to disaster or mass violence will experience immediate intense reactions, which decline over time (e.g. 10-12). Acute distress reactions within the first few weeks should not necessarily be regarded as pathological. Most affected individuals are likely to simply need support and provision of resources in the early phases post-event, rather than traditional diagnosis and clinical treatment. Therefore, screening and identification of those who may need services requires some sensitivity.

In longitudinal disaster studies, stress reactions and symptoms are most likely to be apparent in the year following the disaster, with the majority of those studied showing improvement with time (4). For instance, an analysis of longitudinal studies of two devastating events—a widespread flood in Mexico and the 9/11 terrorist attacks in New York—found seven distinct trajectories of post-event functioning. Up to 50% of survivors showed resistance, never exhibiting more than three PTSD symptoms. About 10% to 32% showed resilience; they had mild symptoms that improved rapidly. Much smaller percentages had severe symptoms that were maintained or that increased over time (10). In another 10-year study of a major fireworks disaster, around 4% to 6% of affected individuals suffered from severe persistent PTSD symptomatology, depression, anxiety and sleep problems. Ten years after the disaster, 16.7% had severe PTSD symptoms (13).

Survivors with high exposure to the event, who lack of social support, or experience ongoing adversity are more likely to face enduring post-disaster distress and symptomatology (10, 11, 14-19). This is true for both adults and children.

Summary

A wide variety of mental health reactions have been reported in studies with survivors of disaster and mass violence. The scale of impact varies across events, with the majority of studies reporting moderate effects that fade over time. However, those most strongly exposed—as well as those who face ongoing adversities—are at risk for long-term problems, even up to 10 years after the event.

References

  1. Morganstein, J. C., West, J. C., Huff, L. A., Flynn, B. W., Fullerton, C. S., Benedek, D. M., & Ursano, R. J. (2016). Psychosocial responses to disaster and exposures: Distress reactions, health risk behavior, and mental disorders. In J. Shigemura & R.K. Chhem (Eds.), Mental health and social issues following a nuclear accident: The case of Fukushima (pp. 99-117). Springer Japan.
  2. Lowe, S. R., & Galea, S. (2017). The mental health consequences of mass shootings. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 62-82. doi:10.1177/1524838015591572
  3. Goldmann, E., & Galea, S. (2014). Mental health consequences of disasters. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 169-183. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182435
  4. Norris, F. H. & Elrod, C. L. (2006). Psychosocial consequences of disasters: A review of past research. In F. H. Norris, S. Galea, M. J. Friedman, & P. J. Watson (Eds.), Methods for disaster mental health research (pp. 20-42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  5. Norris, F. H. (2005). Range, magnitude, and duration of the effects of disasters on mental health: Review update 2005. Research Education Disaster Mental Health, 1-23.
  6. Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B. K., Rourke, K. M., Wilson, D., ... & Kulka, R. A. (2002). Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. JAMA, 288, 581-588. doi:10.1001/jama.288.5.581
  7. Kristensen, P., Weisaeth, L., & Heir, T. (2012). Bereavement and mental health after sudden and violent losses: A review. Psychiatry, 75, 76-97. doi:10.1521/psyc.2012.75.1.76
  8. Miguel-Tobal, J. J., Cano-Vindel, A., Gonzalez-Ordi, H., Iruarrizaga, I., Rudenstine, S., Vlahov, D., & Galea, S. (2006). PTSD and depression after the Madrid March 11 train bombings. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 69-80. doi:10.1002/jts.20091
  9. Pietrzak, R. H., Goldstein, R. B., Southwick, S. M., & Grant, B. F. (2012). Physical health conditions associated with posttraumatic stress disorder in U.S. older adults: Results from wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60, 296-303. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03788.x
  10. Norris, F. H., Tracy, M., & Galea, S. (2009). Looking for resilience: Understanding the longitudinal trajectories of responses to stress. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 2190-2198. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.043
  11. Bonanno, G. A., Brewin, C. R., Kaniasty, K., & La Greca, A. M. (2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: Consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 1-49. doi:10.1177/1529100610387086
  12. Galea, S., Vlahov, D., Resnick, H., Ahern, J., Susser, E., Gold, J., ... & Kilpatrick, D. (2003). Trends of probable post-traumatic stress disorder in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 514-524. doi:10.1093/ajekwg187
  13. Smid, G. E., van der Velden, P. G., Gersons, B. P., & Kleber, R. J. (2012). Late-onset posttraumatic stress disorder following a disaster: A longitudinal study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 312. doi:10.1037/a0023868
  14. Cukor, J., Wyka, K., Mello, B., Olden, M., Jayasinghe, N., Roberts, J., ... & Difede, J. (2011). The longitudinal course of PTSD among disaster workers deployed to the World Trade Center following the attacks of September 11th. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 24, 506-514. doi:10.1002/jts.20672
  15. Cherry, K. E., Sampson, L., Galea, S., Marks, L. D., Nezat, P. F., Baudoin, K. H., & Lyon, B. A. (2017). Optimism and hope after multiple disasters: Relationships to health-related quality of life. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 22, 61-76. doi:10.1080/15325024.2016.1187047
  16. Cerdá, M., Bordelois, P. M., Galea, S., Norris, F., Tracy, M., & Koenen, K. C. (2013). The course of posttraumatic stress symptoms and functional impairment following a disaster: What is the lasting influence of acute versus ongoing traumatic events and stressors? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48, 385-395. doi:10.1007/s00127-012-0560-3
  17. Thordardottir, E. B., Valdimarsdottir, U. A., Hansdottir, I., Resnick, H., Shipherd, J. C., & Gudmundsdottir, B. (2015). Posttraumatic stress and other health consequences of catastrophic avalanches: A 16-year follow-up of survivors. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 32, 103-111. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.03.005
  18. Velden, P. G., Wong, A., Boshuizen, H. C., & Grievink, L. (2013). Persistent mental health disturbances during the 10 years after a disaster: Four-wave longitudinal comparative study. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 67, 110-118. doi:10.1111/pcn.12022
  19. La Greca, A. M., Lai, B. S., Llabre, M. M., Silverman, W. K., Vernberg, E. M., & Prinstein, M. J. (2013). Children's postdisaster trajectories of PTS symptoms: Predicting chronic distress. Child & Youth Care Forum, 42, 351-369. doi:10.1007/s1-566-013-9206-1

You May Also Be Interested In

Continuing Education Online Courses

Learn from expert researchers and earn free Continuing Education (CE) credits.

PTSD Consultation Program

Expert guidance for treating Veterans with PTSD.

Article Database — PTSDpubs

Search the world’s literature on trauma and PTSD.

Get help for PTSD

If you need help right away:

FacebookTwitterYouTube

PTSD Information Voice Mail:
(802) 296-6300
ncptsd@va.gov
Also see: VA Mental Health